Production process of intelligence reports - understanding the intelligence cycle
Typically, intelligence users see intelligence reports that often go through a
complete production process from requirements to product, a process also known as
the intelligence cycle. The intelligence cycle is a structured process that outlines
the steps involved in the eventual production of an intelligence product. The
intelligence cycle is conceptualized in a variety of ways and generally ranges
between four and six steps.
These steps can include: direction, collection,
collation, assessment, analysis, reporting and feedback.
When conducting
investigative Internet activities, the intelligence cycle should play a role in the
process. The intelligence cycle moves from open source information to creating open
source intelligence and ensuring that reports on the results are presented to
decision makers.
1. Direction
In the first
step of the intelligence cycle - confirm the direction and develop a
plan.
Identify intelligence requirements and assign a plan for
collecting data or information. To determine intelligence requirements, intelligence
analysts receive specific needs for intelligence products.
During the
direction phase, the analyst needs to understand the issues that must be addressed
and develop an intelligence collection plan. The intelligence collection plan
outlines the intelligence requirements to ensure that the collection works toward a
clear purpose, summarizes the planned collection and lists priorities for the
intelligence products.
2. Collection
Based
on the intelligence requirements outlined in the intelligence collection plan,
the second phase - the collection phase - is conducted. The collection
phase follows the intelligence collection plan to ensure relevant, accurate, and
valuable information that affects decision making. Internet information collection
may involve multiple sources, which may include:
Social media platforms;
online articles, newspapers, magazines, news and journal articles, motor vehicle
registration and insurance records, satellite maps, corporate research sites, the
dark web, digital marketplaces, public demographics, etc.
3.
Collation
The third phase of the intelligence cycle -
collating information - involves sorting, organizing, classifying, and indexing
the collected data. During the collation phase, relevant information is
grouped to summarize and corroborate the event record.
If audio and video
recordings are archived during an Internet investigation, transcription or
translation may be required. The collation process ensures that investigators or
analysts involved in the intelligence cycle can locate, review, and group the
collected information.
4. Assessment
In the
assessment phase, analysts review the information collected, which should not be
taken at face value, and for each piece of information, the assessment phase
evaluates its validity and the reliability of its source. For this
process, information is typically evaluated using an intelligence grading process.
Source Assessment:
Source assessment assesses the
credibility of the source of information. There are roughly three source gradings:
a. Reliable Sources - Sources are known to be competent and well tested, and
information previously received from them is usually reliable. Reliable information
can be trusted and relied upon.
b. Untested - Information that has not been
previously provided or has been provided that has not been confirmed and therefore
cannot be judged to be reliable. Untested information should be treated with caution
and verified before acting on it.
c. Unreliable - There are reasonable
grounds to doubt the reliability of the source because of inaccuracies in previously
provided information or ulterior motives. Corroborating evidence should be sought
before making decisions about such information.
Carefully examine the source
of information and evaluate and review any sources of information gathered from the
Internet.
Information Assessment:
Information
assessment describes the reliability of the information collected. There are roughly
five levels of information assessment:
a. Direct knowledge of the source -
first-hand information obtained by the source (usually a direct person);
b.
Indirectly known by the source but not confirmed - information that the source has
not witnessed themselves;
c. Indirectly known to the source - information
heard from others;
d. Unknown - information that cannot be evaluated;
e. Suspected to be false.
For any information collected from the
Internet, the information evaluation looks at the source of the information. If the
information is posted by the subject or comes from an official source, the
reliability is direct knowledge of the source. If the information comes from a post
or comment by an unknown person, then the reliability is likely unknown.
Classification of information
During the evaluation
phase, information is usually classified according to its sensitivity. Information
collected from the Internet is usually collected as public information, but when
grouped with internal data and information, it may end up being classified at any
information classification level.
5. Analysis
The analysis phase takes place after the information has been
collected, processed and evaluated. Analyzing information allows
analysts to draw inferences and generate actionable intelligence for decision makers
to use as a reference.
The analysis phase provides contextual insights that
inform the analytical inferences and outlines the importance of the information.
Recognizing the importance of information means understanding what is happening, why
it is happening, how it relates to what is known, why it is relevant, and what will
happen next.
Once the analysis is complete, the intelligence analyst
generates a results-focused intelligence report and recommendations based on the
findings.
Recommended countermeasures should consider:
a. The
results generated by the analysis;
b. The potential risks of the response;
c. The short-, medium-, and long-term impact of the response;
d. And
how to respond.
6. Reporting and feedback
The
final phase of the intelligence cycle - results and feedback - is the timely
delivery of intelligence to those who need it and review of the final
product. Ensure that the intelligence products produced reach decision
makers in the desired format.
Intelligence products can be short summaries,
full reports, geospatial maps, oral briefings, or formal presentations. The
intelligence analyst will deliver the analysis and recommendations in the format
that best suits the target audience.
During the report generation phase, the
analyst determines who should receive the intelligence product and what format they
should receive it in. Analysts may need to produce multiple product formats to suit
different audiences.
Feedback is provided in a timely manner after the
report is generated to evaluate the intelligence product and review whether it meets
the initial request. The results of the feedback are then finally adjusted and
optimized by the intelligence analyst.